- Achat2015: Soil carbon decreases due to intensive forest harvest
- AirClim2010: Boreal Forest and Climate Change – regional perspectives
- Alkama2016: Climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover
- Amiro2010: Carbon release following disturbance of forests in North America
- Anderson2010: Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection
- Andersson & Westholm, 2018: How the research program Future Forests was controlled by the Swedish forest industry.
- Angelstam2019: From forest protection to green infrastructure.
- Ansholm2014: Climate change as a threat to the masculinity of industrial modernity
- Averill2014: Carbon sequestration is governed by mycorrhiza
- Bala2007: Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation
- Berglund2005: Extinction debt for lichen in boreal forests
- Berglund2008: Assessing the extinction vulnerability of wood-inhabiting fungal species
- Berglund2009: Quantifying habitat requirements of tree-living species
- Boyle2010: Pre-historic land use and carbon balance
- Boysen2017: It’s hard to stop climate change by storing carbon from managed biomass production
- Bright2015 – Quantifying surface albedo and other direct biogeophysical climate forcings of forestry activities
- Buchholz2014: Carbon flux in deep soil layers
- Buonocore2013: Environmental cost of forestry activities
- Ceballos2015: The sixth mass-extinction is here
- Ciancio2006: Conversion of plantation to continuous cover forests in Italy
- Cintas2017: The role of the forest for bioenergy
- Clark2016: Today’s climate policy will be felt for millennia
- Clemmensen2013: Root systems and fungi govern long-term carbon sequestration in forests
- Crowther2015: Counting all trees in the world
- Dean2016: Intensive forestry reduces soil carbon
- DeCicco2011: Biofuels and carbon management
- Demirbas2004: Combustion properties of biofuels
- Ehrlich2013: Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?
- Elison2017: Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world
- Ellison2017: The importance of the forest for the water cycle
- Felton2016: Replace monoculture with mixed forests
- Field2008: Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource
- Frey2016: Microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests
- Gamfeldt2013: More ecosystem services with mixed forests
- Gottfried2012: Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change
- Griscom2017: Natural climate solutions
- Gustavsson2017 – Impact of intensive forestry on climate
- Hanley2009: Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability?
- Hansen2008: What carbon dioxide level should we aim for?
- Hanski2002: Extinction debt at the extinction treshold
- Hanski2004: How Much, How To?
- He2016: Forests on drained peatland are carbon sources
- Holm2009: Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect
- Holm2015: A management strategy for multiple ecosystem services in Boreal Forests
- Holtsmark2015: Global warming potential of CO2 emissions from wood fuels
- Hottola2009: Ecology of wood-inhabiting fungal species
- Hudiburg2013: Effects of management strategies on regional forest carbon emissions in Oregon
- Johansson2014: A comparison of subsidies to metal mining and metal recycling
- Johnston2015: Burning wood to save the globe?
- Jonsson2009: How does a boreal forest best sequester carbon?
- Jonsson2016: Increased amount of dead wood in southern Sweden is caused by storms, not changed forestry methods
- Jonsson2019: Managed forests with mixed species can yield more timber
- Kaplan2009: Pre-historic forest cover and deforestation in Europe
- Körner2017: Carbon storage increases with the age of trees, not their growth rate.
- Lacroix2016: Clearcutting leads to loss of soil carbon
- Lefcheck2015: Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats
- Liang2016: Mixed forests have higher productivity globally
- Liao2010: Ecosystem carbon stock influenced by plantation practice
- Linder1992: Changes in forests in northern Sweden 1870-1991
- Lindroth2009: Storms can cause Europe-wide reduction in forest carbon sink
- Lundmark2014: Potential roles of Swedish forestry in the context of climate change mitigation
- Lundmark2016: Comparison of carbon flows under different forestry management regimes
- Luyssaert2008: Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks
- Luyssaert2010: Europe’s carbon balance – forests
- Mackey2013: Land carbon and climate mitigation
- Mason2015: Continuous cover forestry in plantations
- McMahon2014: Genomics and conservation biology
- Meyer2013: A fertile peatland forest does not constitute a major greenhouse gas sink
- Mouillot2013: Rare Species Support Vulnerable Ecosystem Functions
- Nässén2012: Concrete or wood in buildings?
- Naudt2016: Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming
- Newbold2016: Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary?
- Nieminen2018: Ditch maintenance leads to silty streams
- Öckinger2010: Extinction of lichen due to habitat fragmentation
- Oliver2015: Biodiversity and resilience
- Pan2011: A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests
- Payeur2012: Carbon fluxes in black spruce forests
- Piirainen2015: Clearcuts decrease the carbon stock in the soil
- Pukkala2014b: Bioenergy, continuous cover forestry and carbon sequestration
- Pukkala2016: What forest management strategy yields most ecosystem services?
- Rhemtulla2009: Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration
- Riipinen2012: The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth
- Rockström2009: Nine planetary boundaries
- Seidl2008: More carbon is stored by continuous cover forestry
- Smil2011: To harvest Planet Earth
- Spracklen2008: Boreal forests, aerosols and the impacts on clouds and climate
- Stanturf2014: To restore 2 billion hectares of forest
- Steffen2015: Planetary boundaries should guide development
- Stephenson2014: Large trees grow faster
- Sterkenburg2019: Clearcuts kill mycorrhizal fungi
- Sundqvist2014: Methane emissions from clear-cuts and stump removal
- Svensson2018: Landscape fragmentation threatens biodiversity goals
- Tahvonen2010: Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands
- Tahvonen2016: Clear-cutting is not more profitable
- Ter-Mikaelian2015: Does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions?
- Thomas2012: Carbon content of tree tissues
- Tonini2012: Bioenergy from perennial plants
- Williams2017: Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures
Interesting links
Here are some interesting links for you! Enjoy your stay :)Pages
- About this website
- Information Sources
- Multimedia
- Reports
- Scientific articles
- Myth #1: Intensive forestry is good for the climate
- What can I do?
- Biodiversity
- Bioenergy
- Myth #2: Young Forests Sequester Carbon, Mature Forests Do not
- Myth #3: Clearcutting is best way to manage forests
- What Should Society Do?
- Biophysical Effects
- What should the timber industry do?
- Ecosystem Boundaries
- Myth #4: Biodiversity is less important than the climate
- Solutions
- Carbon Offset
- Myth #5: There has never been so much forest in Sweden
- Myths about Climate and Forests
- The Climate Problem
- The Carbon Cycle and Forests
- Consumption of Forestry Products
- The Climate Campaign of the Timber Industry
- Substitution Effects