Klimatet och Skogen
  • Home
    • Bioenergy
    • Biophysical Effects
    • Biodiversity
    • Ecosystem Boundaries
    • The Carbon Cycle and Forests
    • Carbon Offset
    • The Climate Problem
    • Consumption of Forestry Products
    • The Climate Campaign of the Timber Industry
    • Substitution Effects
  • Timber industry myths
    • Myth #1: Intensive forestry is good for the climate
    • Myth #2: Young Forests Sequester Carbon, Mature Forests Do not
    • Myth #3: Clearcutting is best way to manage forests
    • Myth #4: Biodiversity is less important than the climate
    • Myth #5: There has never been so much forest in Sweden
  • Solutions
    • What can I do?
    • What Should Society Do?
    • What should the timber industry do?
  • Information Sources
    • Multimedia
    • Scientific articles
    • Reports
  • About this website
  • English
    • Swedish
    • Dutch
    • German
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Scientific articles

You are here: Home1 / Information Sources2 / Scientific articles
  • Achat2015: Soil carbon decreases due to intensive forest harvest
  • AirClim2010: Boreal Forest and Climate Change – regional perspectives
  • Alkama2016: Climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover
  • Amiro2010: Carbon release following disturbance of forests in North America
  • Anderson2010: Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection
  • Andersson & Westholm, 2018: How the research program Future Forests was controlled by the Swedish forest industry.
  • Angelstam2019: From forest protection to green infrastructure.
  • Ansholm2014: Climate change as a threat to the masculinity of industrial modernity
  • Averill2014: Carbon sequestration is governed by mycorrhiza
  • Bala2007: Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation
  • Berglund2005: Extinction debt for lichen in boreal forests
  • Berglund2008: Assessing the extinction vulnerability of wood-inhabiting fungal species
  • Berglund2009: Quantifying habitat requirements of tree-living species
  • Boyle2010: Pre-historic land use and carbon balance
  • Boysen2017: It’s hard to stop climate change by storing carbon from managed biomass production
  • Bright2015 – Quantifying surface albedo and other direct biogeophysical climate forcings of forestry activities
  • Buchholz2014: Carbon flux in deep soil layers
  • Buonocore2013: Environmental cost of forestry activities
  • Ceballos2015: The sixth mass-extinction is here
  • Ciancio2006: Conversion of plantation to continuous cover forests in Italy
  • Cintas2017: The role of the forest for bioenergy
  • Clark2016: Today’s climate policy will be felt for millennia
  • Clemmensen2013: Root systems and fungi govern long-term carbon sequestration in forests
  • Crowther2015: Counting all trees in the world
  • Dean2016: Intensive forestry reduces soil carbon
  • DeCicco2011: Biofuels and carbon management
  • Demirbas2004: Combustion properties of biofuels
  • Ehrlich2013: Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?
  • Elison2017: Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world
  • Ellison2017: The importance of the forest for the water cycle
  • Felton2016: Replace monoculture with mixed forests
  • Field2008: Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource
  • Frey2016: Microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests
  • Gamfeldt2013: More ecosystem services with mixed forests
  • Gottfried2012: Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change
  • Griscom2017: Natural climate solutions
  • Gustavsson2017 – Impact of intensive forestry on climate
  • Hanley2009: Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability?
  • Hansen2008: What carbon dioxide level should we aim for?
  • Hanski2002: Extinction debt at the extinction treshold
  • Hanski2004: How Much, How To?
  • He2016: Forests on drained peatland are carbon sources
  • Holm2009: Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect
  • Holm2015: A management strategy for multiple ecosystem services in Boreal Forests
  • Holtsmark2015: Global warming potential of CO2 emissions from wood fuels
  • Hottola2009: Ecology of wood-inhabiting fungal species
  • Hudiburg2013: Effects of management strategies on regional forest carbon emissions in Oregon
  • Johansson2014: A comparison of subsidies to metal mining and metal recycling
  • Johnston2015: Burning wood to save the globe?
  • Jonsson2009: How does a boreal forest best sequester carbon?
  • Jonsson2016: Increased amount of dead wood in southern Sweden is caused by storms, not changed forestry methods
  • Jonsson2019: Managed forests with mixed species can yield more timber
  • Kaplan2009: Pre-historic forest cover and deforestation in Europe
  • Körner2017: Carbon storage increases with the age of trees, not their growth rate.
  • Lacroix2016: Clearcutting leads to loss of soil carbon
  • Lefcheck2015: Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats
  • Liang2016: Mixed forests have higher productivity globally
  • Liao2010: Ecosystem carbon stock influenced by plantation practice
  • Linder1992: Changes in forests in northern Sweden 1870-1991
  • Lindroth2009: Storms can cause Europe-wide reduction in forest carbon sink
  • Lundmark2014: Potential roles of Swedish forestry in the context of climate change mitigation
  • Lundmark2016: Comparison of carbon flows under different forestry management regimes
  • Luyssaert2008: Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks
  • Luyssaert2010: Europe’s carbon balance – forests
  • Mackey2013: Land carbon and climate mitigation
  • Mason2015: Continuous cover forestry in plantations
  • McMahon2014: Genomics and conservation biology
  • Meyer2013: A fertile peatland forest does not constitute a major greenhouse gas sink
  • Mouillot2013: Rare Species Support Vulnerable Ecosystem Functions
  • Nässén2012: Concrete or wood in buildings?
  • Naudt2016: Europe’s forest management did not mitigate climate warming
  • Newbold2016: Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary?
  • Nieminen2018: Ditch maintenance leads to silty streams
  • Öckinger2010: Extinction of lichen due to habitat fragmentation
  • Oliver2015: Biodiversity and resilience
  • Pan2011: A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests
  • Payeur2012: Carbon fluxes in black spruce forests
  • Piirainen2015: Clearcuts decrease the carbon stock in the soil
  • Pukkala2014b: Bioenergy, continuous cover forestry and carbon sequestration
  • Pukkala2016: What forest management strategy yields most ecosystem services?
  • Rhemtulla2009: Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration
  • Riipinen2012: The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth
  • Rockström2009: Nine planetary boundaries
  • Seidl2008: More carbon is stored by continuous cover forestry
  • Smil2011: To harvest Planet Earth
  • Spracklen2008: Boreal forests, aerosols and the impacts on clouds and climate
  • Stanturf2014: To restore 2 billion hectares of forest
  • Steffen2015: Planetary boundaries should guide development
  • Stephenson2014: Large trees grow faster
  • Sterkenburg2019: Clearcuts kill mycorrhizal fungi
  • Sundqvist2014: Methane emissions from clear-cuts and stump removal
  • Svensson2018: Landscape fragmentation threatens biodiversity goals
  • Tahvonen2010: Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands
  • Tahvonen2016: Clear-cutting is not more profitable
  • Ter-Mikaelian2015: Does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions?
  • Thomas2012: Carbon content of tree tissues
  • Tonini2012: Bioenergy from perennial plants
  • Williams2017: Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures
  • Multimedia
  • Reports
  • Scientific articles

Besök oss även på

Skyddaskogen.se

Interesting links

Here are some interesting links for you! Enjoy your stay :)

Pages

  • About this website
  • Information Sources
  • Multimedia
  • Reports
  • Scientific articles
  • Myth #1: Intensive forestry is good for the climate
  • What can I do?
  • Biodiversity
  • Bioenergy
  • Myth #2: Young Forests Sequester Carbon, Mature Forests Do not
  • Myth #3: Clearcutting is best way to manage forests
  • What Should Society Do?
  • Biophysical Effects
  • What should the timber industry do?
  • Ecosystem Boundaries
  • Myth #4: Biodiversity is less important than the climate
  • Solutions
  • Carbon Offset
  • Myth #5: There has never been so much forest in Sweden
  • Myths about Climate and Forests
  • The Climate Problem
  • The Carbon Cycle and Forests
  • Consumption of Forestry Products
  • The Climate Campaign of the Timber Industry
  • Substitution Effects

Categories

  • English Category
  • Multimedia
  • Reports
  • Scientific articles
  • Uncategorized

Archive

  • August 2021
  • November 2019
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2015
© Copyright - Klimatet och Skogen - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
Scroll to top